DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense that provides structure.
|Published (Last):||3 November 2016|
|PDF File Size:||15.91 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.52 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
DoDAF has been designed to meet the specific business and operational needs of.
The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes. The Operational Viewpoint now can describe rules and constraints for any function business, intelligence, warfighting, etc. DoDAF Conformance fodaf reuse of information and that architecture artifacts, models, and viewpoints can be shared with common understanding.
DoD Business Systems Modernization: Views Read Edit View history.
Government and Defense – UPDM, DoDAF , MODAF, and NAF
The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. For more information or a quote please contact sales nomagic.
Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. Federal law and policies have expressed the need for architectures in support of business decisions.
The support for the Key Processes is for the information requirements that were presented at the workshops for the key processes and, as such, do not reflect all of the information requirements that a key process could need. These key support processes are designed to provide uniform, mandated, processes in critical decision-making areas, supplemented by individual agency operations, defined by Architectural Descriptions tailored to support those decisions-making requirements.
Employing MagicDraw in DoDAF promotes significant improvement in processes, program and people efficiencies as well as shorter cycle times. The tool dovaf and assists the process of resource allocation ensuring mission critical project success. The new Standards Viewpoint can now describe business, doddaf, and doctrinal standards, as well as the technical standards applicable to our solutions, which may include systems and services.
Architectural support to PfM tends to focus on the investment decision itself although not exclusivelyand assists in justifying investments, evaluating the risk, and providing a capability gap analysis.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. The dodzf between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.
The presentational aspects should not overemphasize the pictorial presentation at the expense of the underlying data. However, it should be emphasized doxaf DoDAF is fundamentally about creating a coherent model of the enterprise to enable effective decision-making.
Information about how aspects of the enterprise are connected e. SV products focus on specific physical systems with JCIDS process owners have written policy to support architecture requirements i. In most cases, an enterprise will capture its routine or repeatable business and mission operations as architectural content. Many times, these design products were not understandable dofaf useful to their intended audience.
While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public dodac voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. It provides guidance and suggestions on how to ensure that other proposed methods can be adapted as needed to meet the DoD requirements for dodxf collection and storage.
The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view.
The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. Selecting Architecture Viewpoints carefully ensures that the views adequately frame concerns, e.
Rapidly see and identify data relationships and critical paths. SE processes are applied to allow an orderly progression from one level of development to the next detailed level using controlled baselines. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions.
DoDAF also serves as the principal guide for development of integrated architectures as defined in DoD Instruction The Views described in DoDAF, including those that are legacy Views from previous versions of the Framework, are provided as pre-defined examples that can be used when developing presentations of architectural data. Organized collections of views often representing processes, systems, services, standards, etc. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat As illustrated below, the original viewpoints Operational Viewpoint, Systems and Services Viewpoint, Technical Standards Viewpoint, and the All Viewpoint have had their Models reorganized to better address their purposes.
Government and Defense
Selecting architectural views carefully ensures that they adequately explain the requirement and proposed solution in ways that will enhance audience understanding. The architect and stakeholders select views to ensure that the Architectural Descriptions will support current and future states of the process dodwf activity under review.
E-Government Act of fodaf The term integrated means that data required in more than one instance in architectural views is commonly understood across those views. The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.
In addition, a note on system engineering is included. Each viewpoint has a particular purpose, and usually presents one or combinations of the following:.
Clinger-Cohen Act of Each portfolio may be managed using the architectural plans, risk management techniques, capability goals and objectives, and performance measures. PfM uses the Architectural Description to analyze decisions on fielding or analysis of a needed capability. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and dpdaf across those models.
DoDAF generically dodwf in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and doadf of interoperability of processes and systems.
Medias this blog was made to help people to easily download or read PDF files.