Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time and History, It should be noted that when Cullmann refers to Hellenism, or Greek. Christ and Time has 26 ratings and 3 reviews. Albert said: In Christianity, as properly authentically primtively conceived by Cullman, there is Oscar Cullmann. OSCAR CULLMANN. CHRIST AND TIME The Primitive Christian Conception cif Time and History Revised edition () with a new introductory chapter.
|Published (Last):||18 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||14.35 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Translated from German by Floyd V. This book, by Oscar Cullman, who is also the author of the book The Christology of the New Testamentand a plethora of other books concerning New Testament Interpretation and Theology, seeks to outline how, according to Cullman, the early church interpreted history and time. Seeking to stay as far away from any philosophical influences Cullmannn wishes to ocsar what the proper Christian understanding of History is according to scripture.
In a sense this book is a contribution to the philosophy of history, but, Cullman does not wish it to be seen this way, rather, he wishes to show how history should be interpreted, in light of the truth of Christianity. This review will begin by explaining the purpose of this book, followed by an outline of the way in which the author accomplishes his purpose. Finally we will speculate concerning the relative utility and worth of this book today. Revelation and salvation take place along the course of an ascending time line.
This fact is the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Here we intend to show how the different individual sections of the whole line are constantly determined from this mid-point, but yet have their own significance in time.
As such, though time may be described truthfully as linear, it is linear in a special redemptive sense, because every point on the timeline of history finds its importance snd how it relates to the redemptive act of Christ on the cross. The book is divided into four main sections, each section is divided into multiple chapters. In the first main section, composed of 8 chapters, Cullman lays out his argument concerning the Christian interpretation of history. In chapter 1 Cullman argues that the New Testament always uses the Greek terms that designate periods of time in relation to the redemptive act of Christ.
This is used to support his claim that: In chapter 2 Cullman sets out to demonstrate the enormous difference between the Hellenic view of Time and History circular and the Christian view of time and History Linear and Redemptive. It should be noted that when Cullmann refers to Hellenism, or Greek philosophy, his main sparring partner is Platonic philosophy. Almost none of the critiques that he throws at Greek osxar apply to Aristotelian thought. Yet one wonders if his comments concerning Greek philosophy and Hellenic thought are not a little overly broad.
In chapter 3 Chrsit sets out to show that the Christian view of the relationship between time and eternity is drastically different from the Greek view of this same relation particularly the Platonistic understanding.
He argues that the Greeks viewed eternity as “timelessness”,  whereas Christians viewed eternity as “the endless succession of the ages”. He provides numerous arguments to prove this point.
He also provides numerous arguments to show that in Christ believers share in the Lordship of God over time though in a limited way of course. He shows that for the Jews, the midpoint of History is still future, and is the dividing line between the present and the coming ages. For the Christian the midpoint of history was the death and resurrection of Christ.
As such the midpoint actually took place during the present age in which we still find ourselvesand the coming age is still future.
As such the midpoint is now past, but is the intepretative key for a proper understanding of prior and future history. Chapter 6 is the weakest chapter of the whole book and the most difficult to understand.
Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time by Oscar Cullmann
In Chapter 6 Cullman explores the Christian use of Myth, Saga, and historical fact alongside one another without distinguishing the differences between them. Myth is described as descriptions of “the processes of creation and nature”,  and Sagas as “things beyond the reach of historical testing. Does he mean that Adam is not historical in the sense that we cannot historically verify that he existed accepting the claims of the Bible by faithor that he never really existed, but is necessary for the Christian conception of redemptive history?
This claim needs to be read in the light of the following statement: In the final chapter of this section Cullman shows how the principle of the representation Israel is to represent God to mankind, and mankind to God; the remnant represents Israel; Jesus represents the remnant, etc. In the second main section, composed of 4 chapters, he explains the characteristics of the 4 important periods of history, the midpoint, the past period, the present period and the future period.
Chapter 1 of Part 2 is used by Cullman to demonstrate, first of all, the great offense of the Cross. He begins by positioning the reader in the skin of the first century Jews who had known Christ in order to help us understand the scandal of believing. He then points out that the first major Christian heresy Docetism was directly related to the scandal of the incarnation, death and resurrection of Christ.
Chapter 2 of Part 2 situates the past stages of redemptive history on the timeline in their relation to the redemptive act of Christ which serves as the Mid-point. In chapter 3 of part 2 Cullmann considers how the future stages the coming age relates to the mid-point on the timeline.
He begins by considering how the Jewish notions of eschatology have been changed by the redemptive act of Christ. He continues by noting that all eschatological hope, for the Christian, is based upon the redemptive act of Christ in past history.
Chapter 4 of part 2 turns to the question of the present day in its relation to the redemptive act of Christ at the mid-point of all history. The preaching of the Gospel is what gives meaning to this intermediary period. In the third main section, also composed of 4 chapters, he compares the four important periods of history that were elaborated in the previous section with the general understanding of world history.
In chapter 1 of part 3 Cullmann considers the paradox of what he calls the Concentration and the Universality of Christianity. Universal because salvation is offered to all men, and all are responsible for their choice. Concentrated because salvation is only found in the church.
In this perspective he discusses the Gentiles and their relation to the Gospel, and considers Romans 1: His interpretations of these texts are quite debatable. In chapter 2 of the third section Cullman holds in Contrast those verses that “speak of Christ’s present Lordship over all things in contrast to those that speak of his Lordship exercised only over that small section which is the Church.
He expounds some interesting views concerning the relationship of church and state. In chapter 4 of part 3 Cullman considers how the primitive Christians viewed the world. Not world deniers, but declaring the absolute sovereignty of Christ over all things, including the world. Christians live in a now but not yet paradox.
Finally, in the fourth main section, composed of 3 chapters he discusses the relati on of the individual person to the past, present and future periods of redemptive history. He argues that everything said in the New Testament concerning the individual man is based upon the structure of redemptive history. In chapter 1 of part 4 he considers how the individual believer is related to the past part of redemption history, first of all as a sinner for whom the redemptive event took place, and secondly as an elect individual.
In chapter 2 of part 4 Cullman considers the individual believer in his relation to the present period of redemptive history. The present is marked by the invisible lordship of Christ and the visible presence of the Church thus baptism and spiritual gifts are discussed and the individual finds his place in both, such that, “But even the most modest service in the Church of Christ belongs in the redemptive history.
In chapter 3 of part 4 Cullman considers the individual believer in his relation to the future period of redemptive history. Thus he relates the future bodily resurrection of the individual believer to the whole of redemptive history.
We are shown the relation of death to the resurrection in light of redemptive history. We are also shown the future aspects of our hope of resurrection. This book is a challenging look at what how the New Testament interprets all of time, the entire history of the cosmos.
This book challenges the Christian reader to put continue making the same audacious claim of the early church, that all of history gets its meaning from its relation to the incarnation, death and resurrection of Jesus-Christ.
Each moment of the past, the present and the future finds its ultimate meaning in the redemptive act of Christ on the Cross.
This book is not properly a philosophy of history, though Christian philosophers of history will need to interact with this book, and be inspired by this book to research and write history with an eye to the cross. This book is not a book that considers the philosophy of time, the author does not worry himself with any philosophical issues concerning time which is the biggest difficulty with this bookas his main concern is to explain how Christ, the apostles and the early church understood and interpreted history.
That being said, philosophers and theologians will certainly find this book interesting as Cullmann makes many interesting claims about time that are interesting on a theological and philosophical level. His view of history is a linear view which entails a definite beginning, and movement towards what might be construed as an ending.
His book is a great reminder to all Christians that the most important moment in all of history was that redemptive act of Christ when he died for our sins and rose for our justification. SCM Press, Immanuel Kant, presented with the extreme empiricism of Hume and the extreme rationalism of Liebniz, which he discovered through the writings Wolff, sought to pscar a middle road between these two extreme philosophical positions.
He saw that the physical sciences, in contrast to rationalistic metaphysics, were actually making advances. They were making discoveries, and building a system of knowledge that accurately described the world of our sense perceptions. Rationalistic metaphysics, on the other hand, was floundering amidst the combating systems that the philosophers were erecting. It did not provide new knowledge, and fullmann led to unacceptable conclusions, such as the Absolute Mon….
The idea of this outline is to help the reader understand the book by providing a simple outline of the basic argument that Taylor is presenting here. The book, which is essentially the manuscript is the fruit of a series of presentations that Taylor made at the Massey Conferences which are hosted by Massey College and Dhrist, is divided into 10 chapters. In the first chapter Taylor essentially proposes three causes recognizing that there may be more of the Malaise of Modernity: Taylor considers the first Malaise in chapters 2 to 8, the second in c….
Cullmamn by Alexander Dru. Reprint, Ignatius Press, This book is composed of tie articles written by the German philosopher Josef Pieper. Though the two articles are intimately connected, they form two distinct works; as such, this book review will begin by giving a brief introduction to the works in question, followed by and exposition of chriist of the works individually. The two articles that are included in this osca, Leisure: Not only did Pieper have the cultural crisis in mind when he wrote these articles, but he was also writing in light of the works of the most well-known German philosopher of the time — Martin Heidegger.
As such, any reader who is familiar with Heidegg….